0.04/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.07/0.32	% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
0.07/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.07/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.07/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.07/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.07/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.07/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.07/0.32	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 06:12:39 EDT 2024
0.07/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.44	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.12/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sLwx5lWTX5/E---3.1_31521.p
0.12/0.47	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.12/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.12/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_ho_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# post_as_ho1 with pid 31672 completed with status 0
0.12/0.47	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.12/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.12/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.12/0.47	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSS00-SSSFFFBN
0.12/0.47	# partial match(2): HHUSF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.12/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 91s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# new_ho_10 with pid 31676 completed with status 9
0.12/0.47	# Starting sh5l with 76s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# sh5l with pid 31684 completed with status 0
0.12/0.47	# Result found by sh5l
0.12/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.12/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.12/0.47	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSS00-SSSFFFBN
0.12/0.47	# partial match(2): HHUSF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.12/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 91s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# new_ho_10 with pid 31676 completed with status 9
0.12/0.47	# Starting sh5l with 76s (1) cores
0.12/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.12/0.47	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.12/0.47	
0.12/0.47	# Proof found!
0.12/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.12/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.12/0.47	thf(decl_23, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.12/0.47	thf(decl_24, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.12/0.47	thf(decl_25, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.12/0.47	thf(decl_26, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.12/0.47	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((~(![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((X1 @ X2 @ X3)))&(X1 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i))&(X1 @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sLwx5lWTX5/E---3.1_31521.p', con)).
0.12/0.47	thf(ax_001, axiom, ((~(((lBob_THFTYPE_i)=(lMary_THFTYPE_i)))&~(((lMary_THFTYPE_i)=(lBill_THFTYPE_i))))&~(((lMary_THFTYPE_i)=(lSue_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.sLwx5lWTX5/E---3.1_31521.p', ax_001)).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((~(![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((X1 @ X2 @ X3)))&(X1 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i))&(X1 @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_3, plain, ((((lBob_THFTYPE_i)!=(lMary_THFTYPE_i))&((lMary_THFTYPE_i)!=(lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((lMary_THFTYPE_i)!=(lSue_THFTYPE_i))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax_001])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i > $i > $o, X8:$i, X9:$i]:(((X7 @ X8 @ X9)|~(X7 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((((lBob_THFTYPE_i)!=(lMary_THFTYPE_i))&((lMary_THFTYPE_i)!=(lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((lMary_THFTYPE_i)!=(lSue_THFTYPE_i))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X2:$i, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X1 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBob_THFTYPE_i))|~((X1 @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((lMary_THFTYPE_i)!=(lSue_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((lSue_THFTYPE_i)=(X2))|((lBob_THFTYPE_i)=(X2)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_6])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((lBob_THFTYPE_i)!=(lMary_THFTYPE_i)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.12/0.47	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
0.12/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.12/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 13
0.12/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.12/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 20
0.12/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
0.12/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
0.12/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 28
0.12/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.12/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.12/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 27
0.12/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.12/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.12/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.12/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.12/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 27
0.12/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
0.12/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.12/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.12/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 19
0.12/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 2
0.12/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.12/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.12/0.47	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.12/0.47	# Total rewrite steps                  : 2
0.12/0.47	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.12/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.12/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.12/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.12/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.12/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.12/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 14
0.12/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.12/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.12/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 9
0.12/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
0.12/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
0.12/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 10
0.12/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.12/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 13
0.12/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.12/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.12/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.12/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.12/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.12/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.12/0.47	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.12/0.47	# Condensation attempts                : 28
0.12/0.47	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.12/0.47	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 759
0.12/0.47	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 49
0.12/0.47	
0.12/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.47	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.12/0.47	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.12/0.47	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.12/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
0.12/0.47	
0.12/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.47	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.12/0.47	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.12/0.47	# Total time               : 0.015 s
0.12/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.12/0.47	% E---3.1 exiting
0.12/0.47	% E exiting
0.12/0.47	EOF